The prosecutor admitted: IONUT WAS KILLED BY DOGS WITH OWNER!!!

This is a very important. At page 12 you can read: “IONUT WAS KILLED BY DOGS WITH OWNER”!!! Please share this information all over the world and tell everyone that Anghel family lied all the time. Please let everyone know that IREC lied about this case and an inocent man was fired because of this family. Share this document as soon as possible.

Picture2

http://www.ziarulring.ro/arhiva/files/documente/ionutrechizitoriu.pdf

 

Because of this, I personaly demand that all journalists, politicians, local authorities, member of IREC who instigated against stray dogs and lied about this Ionut case to be investigated. I know that nobody will do anything about this and I also know that the Anghel family lies was so huge that it would have been strange to blame dogs, but they still protect them from the accusation of negligence. We must act now against all persons mentioned above who took criminal measures against stray dogs. An IREC member also lied about another dog bite, who proved that he was a dog with owner, not a stray dog. Razvan Bancescu, the leader of ASPA also told that those dogs were stray dogs. So you see the stray dogs mass killing has many supporters only because is a good business for all involved.

About xnici

Om normal la minte si la suflet
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to The prosecutor admitted: IONUT WAS KILLED BY DOGS WITH OWNER!!!

  1. coco says:

    “s-au identificat peste 100 de plagi muscate” = nimeni nu s-a sinchisit sa le numere (interesant de contradictoriu cu regulamentul inml, in contextul in care TOATE leziunile se identifica)

    “leziuni traumatice (o multitudine de excoriatii, echimoze) care s-au putut produce prin actiunea unghiilor cainilor”: unghiile cainilor se numesc “gheare” (orice medic adevarat, nu care si-a cumparat diploma, stie asta). iar orice proprietar de caine stie ca ghearele nu provoaca echimoze (vanatai). loviturile puternice, poate.

    “fara indoiala ca reactia cel putin discutabila a bunicii celor doi minori dupa disparitia acestora din spatiul ei de supraveghere, lasand sa treaca o perioada importanta de timp in speranta ca se vor intoarce, fara a solicita ajutorul autoritatilor, justifica in buna masura revolta unei parti a opiniei publice”… NOI VREM SA STIM DE CE NU I-A SUPRAVEGHEAT, A.I. SA NU PLECE AIA 2 MINORI DIN GRIJA EI, nu ca nu s-a ambalat rapid.

    si sa nu uitam ca pentru ca ionut a murit repede (pe la 11.00), bunica n-a mai gresit cu nimic.
    “in aceste conditii, ar trebui dovedit […] ca in cazul alertarii imediate a autoritatilor, moartea nu ar fi intervenit – argument speculativ, care nu poate sa stea la baza angajarii raspunderii penale.”

    si poate cineva sa-mi traduca in logica: “nu exista probe care sa infirme sustinerea numitei aurica, ca minorii au disparut intr-un moment in care i-a pierdut, pentru foarte scurt timp, din campul vizual”?
    cand nu gasesti ceva cu privirea, l-ai pierdut, nu? pana nu-l vezi din nou, tii in brate, ramane pierdut.

    penibil: bunica e “scuzata”, pentru ca ionut oricum a murit prea repede.

    insa actul asta se dovedeste un domino pervers: un ratat de medic strain, un arab cu bani si pile care a ocupat si va ocupa locurile unor romani civilizati (la facultate si serviciu), a manipulat raportul medico-legal, pentru ca actul de justitie sa nu fie savarsit. justitie.
    clar, nu are demnitate, si este un om rau, si un rau credincios in allah. dar si allah e sus si vede, nu?

    • xnici says:

      Bunica e scuzata pentru ca tot acest circ trebuia sa aiba alta finalitate. Nimeni nu trebuia sa descopere ca acel drum dura 2 ore si ca era imposibil de batut de piciorul unor copii atat de mici si nimeni nu trebuia sa faca investigatii paralele. Familia era protejata de afacerile pe care le-a avut cu Primaria ca acolo e ceva putred, dar nimeni nu vrea sa cerceteze. Bine, sa cerceteze cine? Mass-media de cacat? Hotii sa-i cerceteze pe hoti? Imposibil.

    • Viorel says:

      Doctorul arab nu o fi avand cetatenie romana si i so fi promis ca i se da cetatenia daca face actele cum i se spune. Daca e sirian sau palestinian, cred si eu ca nu vrea sa se intoarca inapoi in tara lui!

      • xnici says:

        sa nu uitam ca arabii considera cainii animale murdare, deci din start este in neregula ca tocmai el face autopsii in aceste cazuri.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s